top of page

Noncompetes Will Not Be Banned (For Now)

Updated: Sep 27

FTC Non-Compete Ban Blocked by Texas Judge

Over the past few months, we’ve been covering the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Non-Compete Clause Rule. The rule intended to ban non-compete agreements for most employees nationwide. In this newest update, however, Judge Ada Brown of the Northern District of Texas issued a broad order invalidating the final rule. As of August 20th, 2024, the noncompete ban is blocked. For employers and employees, this means noncompete agreements can continued to be upheld and issued.


Events Leading Up to this Decision

We shared a timeline of events regarding the FTC’s Non-Compete Clause Rule, as it was first introduced this year, with American Spa Magazine. We also covered the issue on our blog. 


Below we've outlined a timeline of events and legal challenges to the rule.



The newest decision blocking the FTC’s attempted ban comes in the wake of a longstanding debate about using noncompete agreements in healthcare. Critics argue that the agreements stifle competition and patient access to care. Healthcare organizations in favor of noncompetes strive to protect their investments in the clinicians and care teams they employ.


An estimated one in five Americans is subject to a noncompete agreement from their employer. However, that number is much higher in healthcare. The American Medical Association (AMA) reports that the agreements affect between 37%-45% of physicians. 


In reaching her decision invalidating the final rule, Judge Brown found that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority. She also concluded that the Final Rule failed to meet the Administrative Procedure Act’s “arbitrary-and-capricious standard.” She stated The Rule “fails to consider the positive benefits of non-compete agreements, and disregards the substantial body of evidence supporting these agreements.


What's Next for Noncompetes?

With Judge Brown blocking the rule, the FTC faces a choice. The agency can appeal the decision, potentially bringing the case to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. If the appeal is unsuccessful or if the case continues to face legal hurdles, it might eventually be taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court. The outcome of any appeal could set a significant precedent for the scope of the FTC's regulatory power.


Stay Up-to-Date and Compliant with Marti Law Group

Our team is dedicated to staying current as issues like this one evolve. And, we’re committed to keeping our clients informed, too. Reach out to us to learn how working with Marti Law Group or becoming a member can help you protect your practice–and set it up for long term growth and success.

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.

Disclaimer: This website is solely intended for the purpose of providing general information. This blog post is not a substitute for legal advice, thus no attorney-client relationship is created. An attorney-client relationship is only formed with Marti Law Group after you have signed an Engagement Letter. Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice. Every situation is different and fact-specific, and a proper legal analysis is necessary. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. To schedule a consultation with an attorney at Marti Law Group, please contact: info@martilawgroup.com or 860-552-7770

bottom of page